4.3 Article

Risk factors for peristomal skin disorders associated with temporary ileostomy construction

期刊

SURGERY TODAY
卷 51, 期 7, 页码 1152-1157

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02209-x

关键词

Temporary ileostomy; Skin disorders; Height of stoma; Rectal surgery

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Skin disorders are common complications after temporary diverting loop ileostomy, with overweight and lower stoma height being independent risk factors. Constructing a well-elevated stoma can reduce the occurrence of skin disorders associated with temporary ileostomy construction.
Purpose Skin disorders are the most common stoma-related complications after temporary diverting loop ileostomy with proctectomy. The aim of the present study was to investigate risk factors for skin disorders associated with temporary ileostomy construction. Methods A total of 185 consecutive patients who underwent curative proctectomy with temporary diverting loop ileostomy for rectal malignancies at a single comprehensive cancer center between 2013 and 2018 were collected and analyzed. Results The most frequent stoma-related complications were skin disorders (n = 62, 33.5%), followed by mucocutaneous separation (n = 38, 20.5%) and high-output stoma (n = 34, 18.4%). Patients with skin disorders had a higher median body mass index (BMI; 22.4 vs. 21.3 kg/m(2), P = 0.002) and lower stoma height (16 vs. 20 mm, P < 0.001) than those without skin disorders. According to a multivariable logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of skin disorders included overweight (median BMI >= 25 kg/m(2) [odds ratio = 3.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-8.6], P = 0.004) and lower stomal height (median stoma height < 20 mm [odds ratio = 3.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.6-6.3], P < 0.001). Conclusion Overweight and lower stoma height are correlated with the presence of skin disorders. Construction of a well-elevated stoma can reduce skin disorders associated with temporary ileostomy construction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据