4.3 Article

Outcomes of lung transplantation for idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis

期刊

SURGERY TODAY
卷 51, 期 8, 页码 1276-1284

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02232-6

关键词

Chest wall; Interstitial lung disease; Pulmonary function; Survival analysis; Transplantation; Lung

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite extrapulmonary problems such as a flat chest, low BMI, and associated restrictive impairment persisting in patients with IPPFE, patient survival after LT for IPPFE or IPF was equivalent.
Purpose This study was performed to compare the outcome of lung transplantation (LT) for idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (IPPFE) with that of LT for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Methods We reviewed, retrospectively, all adult patients who underwent LT for IPPFE or IPF in Japan between 1998 and 2018. Results There were 100 patients eligible for this study (31 with IPPFE and 69 with IPF). Patients with IPPFE tended to have a significantly lower body mass index (BMI) than those with IPF (median, 16.7 vs. 22.6 kg/m(2), respectively; P < 0.01). However, Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed no significant difference in overall survival between the groups. The BMI did not increase in patients with IPPFE, even 1 year after LT (pretransplant, 16.5 +/- 3.2 kg/m(2) vs. 1 year post-transplant, 15.6 +/- 2.5 kg/m(2); P = 0.08). The percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) 1 year after LT was significantly lower in the IPPFE group than in the IPF group (48.4% +/- 19.5% vs. 68.6% +/- 15.5%, respectively; P < 0.01). Conclusions Despite extrapulmonary problems such as a flat chest, low BMI, and associated restrictive impairment persisting in patients with IPPFE, patient survival after LT for IPPFE or IPF was equivalent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据