Impact of consultation recordings on patient-reported outcomes in patients with brain tumors: a parallel randomized controlled trial

Objective We aimed to determine the impact of a primary treatment consultation recording on perception of being informed, satisfaction with cancer care, satisfaction with the oncologist, and psychological distress in patients with brain tumors. Methods This was a prospective, double-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial conducted in 3 Canadian cities, in which patients who had their initial treatment consultation recorded were assigned to either receive their digital recording or not. It was hypothesized that patients who received their recording would realize statistically significant benefit on the outcomes of interest at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months post-consultation in comparison to patients who did not receive their recording. Outcome measures included the following: Patient Satisfaction with Cancer Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, PrestMan Satisfaction with Doctor Scale, and Perception of Being Informed Scale. Results Of the 246 eligible patients, 133 participated (60.9% male; age M=52.4 years; 53.4% grade IV disease). Of these, 63 received their consultation recording and 70 did not. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that, compared to baseline, patients who received their consultation recording reported being more fully informed about their disease and treatment at 1 week post-consultation than patients who did not receive their recording (p = 0.007), but this finding was no longer significant at 3 and 6 months. There were no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups on the measures of satisfaction with cancer care, satisfaction with the doctor, and depression or anxiety at any assessment time point, though the study was under-powered. Conclusion The study findings show that primary treatment consultation recordings may provide limited benefit beyond brain tumor patients' perception of being informed, despite being highly valued by these patients, and high listening rates among their significant others. The lack of statistical power should be considered when interpreting the findings.

Automated summary

The study found that brain tumor patients who received primary treatment consultation recordings reported better perception of being informed at 1 week post-consultation compared to those who did not, but this difference was no longer significant at 3 and 6 months. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of satisfaction with cancer care, satisfaction with the doctor, and depression or anxiety, potentially due to under-powering of the study.