4.7 Article

A new model updating strategy with physics-based and data-driven models

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-021-02868-5

关键词

Model updating; Physics-based model; Data-driven model; Gaussian process; Maximum likelihood estimation

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council [201808330375]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51475425]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ18E050014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a novel approach that combines physics-based and data-driven models to maximize the utilization of existing limited information for improving predictive performance. The physics-based model is updated by selecting suitable updating methods and formulations, followed by constructing a data-driven model and using weight combination to obtain an updated predictive model.
For engineering simulation models, insufficient experimental data and imperfect understanding of underlying physical principles often make predictive models inaccurate. It is difficult to reduce the model bias effectively with limited information. To improve the predictive performances of the models, this paper proposes a new model updating strategy utilizing a data-driven model to integrate with a physics-based model. One of the main strengths of the proposed method is that it maximizes the utilization of existing limited information by combining physics-based and data-driven models built based on different principles. First, the physics-based model is updated via selecting a suitable updating method and updating formulation. A data-driven model is then constructed using the Gaussian process (GP) regression. Finally, a weight combination is employed to obtain the updated predictive model where the weights of experimental sites and non-experimental sites are determined by the minimum discrepancy of probability distributions of the posterior error and another data-driven model, respectively. The Sandia thermal challenge problem is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据