4.6 Article

Remanent solvent management engineering of perovskite films for PEDOT: PSS-based inverted solar cells

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 530-536

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.01.044

关键词

Perovskite solar cells; Solvent control; DMSO; Gradient annealing; Post-treatment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51403005]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2018JY0015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals the significant impact of DMSO solvent on the final perovskite film morphology, and managing residual solvent carefully can lead to smoother and more uniform films. Employing a gradient annealing process to retard solvent evaporation can enhance the efficiency of PEDOT: PSS-based inverted PSCs.
Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have been attracting tremendous attention due to ease of processing, flexibility, and high performance. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) are the two most widely used solvents to dissolve perovskite precursors. Here, we investigate the impact of residual amount and evaporation rate of the DMSO inside the precursor films on the microstructure of the ultimate perovskite films. We decouple the DMSO and DMF solvents and demonstrate that DMSO component exhibits great and dominant influence on the final film morphology by using quasi in-situ photoluminescence (PL) measurement and X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterization of the wet films after spin-coating. Much more smooth and uniform perovskite films are obtained by careful management of remanent solvent, including decreasing residual amount by shelving the precursor films prior to heating and retarding the evaporation of the solvent via adopting a gradient annealing (GA) process. In consequence, the as-prepared PEDOT: PSS-based inverted PSCs yield a champion efficiency of 15.59% with high reproducibility. This work shows great potential in preparing high-quality perovskite films through a simple remanent solvent management engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据