4.6 Article

TiO2 nanorods integrated with titania nanoparticles: Large specific surface area 1D nanostructures for improved efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs)

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 311-320

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.12.060

关键词

Hydrothermal method; One dimensional nanostructure; Integrated TiO2 nanorods; Annealing temperature; Dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs)

资金

  1. Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) [97008082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impact of alkali concentration on the formation of novel one dimensional TiO2 nanostructures. The prepared nanostructures showed peculiar appearance and improved efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cells, demonstrating the potential for further applications in photovoltaic devices.
In this work, the impact of alkali concentration on the formation of novel one dimensional TiO2 nanostructures has been studied. The variation of alkali concentration resulted in the change of morphology and structure of P25 nanoparticle precursors under hydrothermal conditions, as confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) nitrogen adsorption-desorption, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. The effects of the annealing temperatures on the surface oxygen vacancies were also studied under various temperatures. In higher NaOH concentrations under annealing, these nanostructures have a peculiar appearance consisting in nanorods with nanoparticles grown on their surface and hence designated herein as integrated TiO2 nanorods. The prepared nanostructures were employed as main precursors of photoanode and their performance was fully investigated in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). TiO2 nanostructures prepared from 12 M alkaline solution at 300 degrees C had the largest specific surface area (363.15 m(2)/g) and the best efficiency improvement was about 41% for these TiO2 nanostructures compared to the P25 nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据