4.7 Article

Global sensitivity analysis of probabilistic tunnel seismic deformations using sparse polynomial chaos expansions

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106470

关键词

Tunnel; Earthquake; Sensitivity index; Probabilistic analysis; Sparse polynomial chaos expansions

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council [201708130080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the feasibility of using surrogate models for global sensitivity analysis in seismic soil-tunnel systems, validating the accuracy and efficiency of the method. Parametric sensitivity analysis reveals that soil shear wave velocity and modulus reduction factor are key variables influencing seismic deformations in tunnels.
There is an increasing interest in utilizing surrogate models to perform the global sensitivity analysis (GSA) for the uncertainty quantification since they allow to quantify efficiently the relative importance of each input parameter with relatively small computational costs. This paper aims at investigating the feasibility of applying this method to a stochastic soil-tunnel system in seismic conditions. An advanced technique named sparse polynomial chaos expansions (SPCE) is introduced to build a surrogate model that allows performing a GSA combined with the Sobol' indices. The accuracy and efficiency of the SPCE-GSA method are validated by comparison with the true numerical predictions and Monte Carlo simulations. Parametric sensitivity analyses are performed for a wide range of the soil shear wave velocities, ground motion intensities, probability distribution types, and coefficients of variation, assuming a nonlinear soil behavior. The influences of the sampling size, polynomial degree, and ground motion characteristics on the variability in the sensitivity indices are evaluated. The results show that the soil shear wave velocity and modulus reduction factor are the two variables that significantly affect the seismic deformations of tunnels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据