4.6 Article

Rule-based multi-view human activity recognition system in real time using skeleton data from RGB-D sensor

期刊

SOFT COMPUTING
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 405-421

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-021-05649-w

关键词

Activity recognition; Microsoft Kinect; Multi-view; Rule-based classifier; Tracking skeleton

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a rule-based classifier method for real-time recognition of view-invariant multiple human activities. By applying a skeleton-tracking algorithm, activities are recognized independently from each tracked skeleton. Experimental results demonstrate the robustness and efficiency of the method for activities with multiple views, scaling, and phase variations.
Identification of human activity with decent precision is a challenging task in the field of computer vision, especially when applying for surveillance purpose. A rule-based classifier method is proposed in this paper, which is capable of recognizing a view-invariant multiple human activity recognition in real time. A single Kinect sensor is used for the input of RGB-D data in real time. Initially, a skeleton-tracking algorithm is applied. After tracking the skeletons, activities are recognized from each individually tracked skeleton independently. Different rules are defined to recognize discrete skeleton positions and classify a particular order of multiple postures into activities. During the experimentation, we examine about 14 activities and found that the proposed method is robust and efficient concerning multiple views, scaling and phase variation activities during different realistic acts. A self-generated dataset in the controlled environment is used for the experiment. About 2 min of data was collected. Data from two different males were collected for multiple human activities. Experimental results show that the proposed method is flexible and efficient for multiple view activities as well as scale and phase variation activities. It provides a detection accuracy of 98%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据