4.8 Article

Hybridized Radial and Edge Coupled 3D Plasmon Modes in Self-Assembled Graphene Nanocylinders

期刊

SMALL
卷 17, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202100079

关键词

3D; graphene; nanocylinders; plasmons; self‐ assembly

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1454293]
  2. National Science Foundation through the National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure (NNCI) [ECCS-2025124]
  3. National Science Foundation through the University of Minnesota MRSEC [DMR-2011401]
  4. National Science Foundation through the UMN MRSEC [DMR-2011401]
  5. University of Minnesota
  6. U.S. DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By utilizing a plasma-triggered self-assembly process, 3D graphene nanocylinders are introduced, which induce significantly stronger plasmon fields compared to 2D graphene patterns. Synchrotron nanospectroscopy measurements confirm the preservation of hybridized 3D graphene plasmons in high precision curved nanocylinders.
Current graphene-based plasmonic devices are restricted to 2D patterns defined on planar substrates; thus, they suffer from spatially limited 2D plasmon fields. Here, 3D graphene forming freestanding nanocylinders realized by a plasma-triggered self-assembly process are introduced. The graphene-based nanocylinders induce hybridized edge (in-plane) and radial (out-of-plane) coupled 3D plasmon modes stemming from their curvature, resulting in a four orders of magnitude stronger field at the openings of the cylinders than in rectangular 2D graphene ribbons. For the characterization of the 3D plasmon modes, synchrotron nanospectroscopy measurements are performed, which provides the evidence of preservation of the hybridized 3D graphene plasmons in the high precision curved nanocylinders. The distinct 3D modes introduced in this paper, provide an insight into geometry-dependent 3D coupled plasmon modes and their ability to achieve non-surface-limited (volumetric) field enhancements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据