4.8 Review

Rare-Earth-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks as Multifunctional Platforms for Catalytic Conversion

期刊

SMALL
卷 17, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202005371

关键词

catalytic conversion; metal– organic frameworks; rare earth

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21971117, 21771156, 21661023, 21971129, 21961024, 21961025]
  2. 111 Project from China [B18030]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Resource Utilization [RERU2019001]
  4. Functional Research Funds for the Central Universities, Nankai University [ZB19500202]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China [2018BS05007]
  6. Cooperation Project of State Key Laboratory of Baiyun Obo Rare Earth Resource Researches and Comprehensive Utilization [2017Z1950]
  7. Inner Mongolia Natural Science Foundation [2018JQ05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The collaboration between rare-earth elements and metal-organic frameworks has brought new possibilities to the field of catalytic conversion, providing promising catalysts or supports for energy conversion, environmental governance, and organic synthesis. RE-MOFs as promising candidates for catalytic conversion have attracted considerable attention.
The development of catalytic conversion is very important for human society. In the catalytic process, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) can be utilized to obtain effective catalysts for their porous structures and adjustable properties. In addition, the introduction of rare-earth (RE) elements with unique properties for catalysts can realize good catalytic performances. Thus, the RE-MOF related catalysts for catalytic conversion are summarized. Due to the cooperation of RE elements and porous MOF structures, the RE-based MOFs can be used as promising catalysts or precursors/supports for other catalysts in the areas of energy conversion, environmental governance, and organic synthesis. These aggregated studies highlight the RE-MOFs as promising candidates for catalytic conversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据