4.7 Article

Graphene-bentonite supported free-standing, flexible membrane with switchable wettability for selective oil-water separation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118569

关键词

Free-standing membrane; Graphene Oxide; Recyclability; Switchable; Wastewater treatment

资金

  1. Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Research Training and Human Development Institute (SARTHI)
  2. CSIR fund [22/0748/17/EMR-II]
  3. SARTHI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The novel SBG composite membrane successfully achieved selective separation of oil and water with high efficiency, recyclability, and ease of preparation.
In this work, we synthesized a novel, free-standing, flexible sodium-bentonite-fabricated graphene (SBG) composite membrane. The prepared SBG membrane was successfully employed for the selective separation of oil and water. SBG-fabricated filter paper and cotton cloth membranes were easily prepared using simple vacuum filtration and coating methods. The SBG composite membrane exhibited switchable wettability properties, which rendered it capable of switching the surface into either hydrophilic/oleophobic or hydrophobic/oleophilic with the selective treatment of water or oil/organic solvent, respectively. The prepared SBG composite was characterized using X-ray diffraction, thermo-gravimetric analysis, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The as-prepared membrane has high efficiency (>98%) to separate oil-water mixtures, a good recyclability (96% efficiency after 10 cycles), a high flux of 625 Lm(-2) h (-1), and a good oil rejection ratio (>97%). The SBG composite can easily be scaled to separate the oil-water mixture for industrial applications. Furthermore, the advantages of the membrane are its easy preparation, self-cleaning property, switchable wettability property (hydrophilic/oleophobic to hydrophobic/oleophilic and vice versa), high flux and excellent recyclability for the selective separation of oil/organic solvents and water from their mixtures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据