4.7 Article

Enhanced performances of chlorinated polyvinyl chloride (CPVC) ultrafiltration membranes by styrene-maleic anhydride copolymer

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.118043

关键词

Copolymer; Anhydride; Ultrafiltration; Permeability; Antifouling

资金

  1. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guizhou Province [[2020]4Y021, [2019]1422]
  2. Talent Cultivation Project of Guizhou Province [[2019]5633, [2015]4014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blending styrene-maleic anhydride copolymer (SMA) with CPVC can improve the performance of ultrafiltration membranes by adjusting microstructures, increasing pure water flux and permeability, reducing irreversible fouling index, and enhancing flux recovery ratio.
To enhance the performances of the CPVC ultrafiltration membranes, herein, styrene-maleic anhydride copolymer (SMA), an amphiphilic copolymer, was used to blend with CPVC to adjust the microstructures of membranes. The pure CPVC and SMA/CPVC composite ultrafiltration membranes were prepared by a non-solventinduced phase inversion process. It has been proved that SMA and CPVC were partially compatible according to the rheological behavior of casting solution, DSC, FT-IR and SEM. SMA changed the phase separation mechanism and the pore structure of the composite membranes, and significantly increased the porosity. According to the results of ATR-FTIR, EDS and XPS analysis, intact anhydride groups existed on the surface of the composite membranes, which enhanced the permeability of membranes. The SMA/CPVC composite ultrafiltration membranes with 2 wt% SMA exhibited superior pure water flux (459.85 L/m(2).h), protein rejection (97.2%) and permeability flux (140.69 L/m2.h) compared with the neat CPVC membrane (248.97 L/m(2).h, 74.5%, 74.14 L/m(2).h, respectively) at 0.1 MPa. Moreover, the flux recovery ratio increased from 55.32% to 92.68% and irreversible fouling index decreased from 42.51% to 5.00%. Importantly, the antifouling mechanism of the SMA/ CPVC ultrafiltration membrane was discussed in detail.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据