4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical investigation on the separation of hydrophilic fine particles using heterogeneous condensation preconditioning technique in gas cyclones

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.118126

关键词

Heterogeneous condensation; Cyclone; Experiment; Simulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676146]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of operating parameters on the heterogeneous condensation process and separation efficiency of gas cyclones. The results showed that increasing the initial supersaturation degree led to an increase in particle size and removal efficiency, while increasing the gas flow rate decreased particle size and increased removal efficiency. The use of heterogeneous condensation preconditioning technique significantly improved the removal efficiency of fine particles in gas cyclones.
Improving the removal efficiency of gas cyclones becomes critical as air pollution aggravates. This study aims to investigate the effects of operating parameters on the process of heterogeneous condensation and separation performance of gas cyclones. For hydrophilic fine particles, an experimental apparatus was built up to analyze the heat transfer and removal efficiency. Then a two- way coupling numerical model in which the interactions between particles and gas was achieved by user defined function was adopted. Compared with experimental and numerical results, the accuracy of simulation satisfied engineering application. In addition, as the initial supersaturation degree S-0 increases, the particle size at growth chamber outlet and removal efficiency increase by 69.89%, 107.01% respectively. While increasing the gas flow rate F decreases particle size by 3.59% and increases removal efficiency by 17.91%. By heterogeneous condensation preconditioning technique, the removal efficiency for fine particles can reach 95.12%. These results can help optimize and apply this preconditioning technique of gas cyclones in engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据