4.6 Review

Wearable Devices Suitable for Monitoring Twenty Four Hour Heart Rate Variability in Military Populations

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21041061

关键词

wearable technology; reliability; validity; occupational groups; long term; heart rate variability

资金

  1. UK Ministry of Defence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heart rate variability (HRV) measurements provide insights into the autonomic nervous system and sympathetic activity balance. High HRV indicates good adaptability, while low HRV may signal fatigue, overtraining, or health issues. The Polar H10 stands out as the most accurate wearable device currently available, although it requires additional cost for data extraction without using an app.
Heart rate variability (HRV) measurements provide information on the autonomic nervous system and the balance between parasympathetic and sympathetic activity. A high HRV can be advantageous, reflecting the ability of the autonomic nervous system to adapt, whereas a low HRV can be indicative of fatigue, overtraining or health issues. There has been a surge in wearable devices that claim to measure HRV. Some of these include spot measurements, whilst others only record during periods of rest and/or sleep. Few are capable of continuously measuring HRV (>= 24 h). We undertook a narrative review of the literature with the aim to determine which currently available wearable devices are capable of measuring continuous, precise HRV measures. The review also aims to evaluate which devices would be suitable in a field setting specific to military populations. The Polar H10 appears to be the most accurate wearable device when compared to criterion measures and even appears to supersede traditional methods during exercise. However, currently, the H10 must be paired with a watch to enable the raw data to be extracted for HRV analysis if users need to avoid using an app (for security or data ownership reasons) which incurs additional cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据