4.6 Article

Utilising Flow Aggregation to Classify Benign Imitating Attacks

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21051761

关键词

NetFlow; network traffic; intrusion detection; machine learning; features; CICIDS2017; cyber-attacks

资金

  1. European Union [833673]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cyber-attacks are increasing in volume and sophistication, with advancements in computational power and human understanding contributing to their growth. By introducing new high-level abstraction features, models can better classify attacks that mimic benign traffic, improving detection accuracy.
Cyber-attacks continue to grow, both in terms of volume and sophistication. This is aided by an increase in available computational power, expanding attack surfaces, and advancements in the human understanding of how to make attacks undetectable. Unsurprisingly, machine learning is utilised to defend against these attacks. In many applications, the choice of features is more important than the choice of model. A range of studies have, with varying degrees of success, attempted to discriminate between benign traffic and well-known cyber-attacks. The features used in these studies are broadly similar and have demonstrated their effectiveness in situations where cyber-attacks do not imitate benign behaviour. To overcome this barrier, in this manuscript, we introduce new features based on a higher level of abstraction of network traffic. Specifically, we perform flow aggregation by grouping flows with similarities. This additional level of feature abstraction benefits from cumulative information, thus qualifying the models to classify cyber-attacks that mimic benign traffic. The performance of the new features is evaluated using the benchmark CICIDS2017 dataset, and the results demonstrate their validity and effectiveness. This novel proposal will improve the detection accuracy of cyber-attacks and also build towards a new direction of feature extraction for complex ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据