4.6 Article

Natural Frequencies Identification by FEM Applied to a 2-DOF Planar Robot and Its Validation Using MUSIC Algorithm

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21041209

关键词

natural frequencies; finite element method; MUSIC algorithm; spectral analysis; 2-DOF planar robot

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) [783323]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper applies the finite element method and the MUSIC algorithm to identify the natural frequencies of a two degrees-of-freedom planar robot, with validation through experiments. The results demonstrate that the proposed methodology can effectively overcome challenges such as high-level noise and close frequencies, improving frequency resolution and aiding in path planning and controller gain selection.
In this paper, the natural frequencies (NFs) identification by finite element method (FEM) is applied to a two degrees-of-freedom (2-DOF) planar robot, and its validation through a novel experimental methodology, the Multiple Signal Classification (MUSIC) algorithm, is presented. The experimental platforms are two different 2-DOF planar robots with different materials for the links and different types of actuators. The FEM is carried out using ANSYS (TM) software for the experiments, with vibration signal analysis by MUSIC algorithm. The advantages of the MUSIC algorithm against the commonly used fast Fourier transform (FFT) method are also presented for a synthetic signal contaminated by three different noise levels. The analytical and experimental results show that the proposed methodology identifies the NFs of a high-resolution robot even when they are very closed and when the signal is embedded in high-level noise. Furthermore, the results show that the proposed methodology can obtain a high-frequency resolution with a short sample data set. Identifying the NFs of robots is useful for avoiding such frequencies in the path planning and in the selection of controller gains that establish the bandwidth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据