4.6 Article

Monitoring Contractile Cardiomyocytes via Impedance Using Multipurpose Thin Film Ruthenium Oxide Electrodes

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21041433

关键词

ruthenium oxide; electrical impedance spectroscopy; cardiomyocytes; Fourier analysis

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [669768]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A ruthenium oxide (RuOx) electrode was utilized to monitor contractile events of human pluripotent stem cells-derived cardiomyocytes (hPSC-CMs) through electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), showing comparable signal and periodicity to standard thin film Pt electrodes. The RuOx electrodes can also function as electrochemical sensors for pH, O-2, and nitric oxide, enhancing their versatility in in vitro studies. Frequency analyses revealed almost identical frequency components between EIS and visual data, indicating their capability to capture similar events of the beating of hPSC-CMs.
A ruthenium oxide (RuOx) electrode was used to monitor contractile events of human pluripotent stem cells-derived cardiomyocytes (hPSC-CMs) through electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Using RuOx electrodes presents an advantage over standard thin film Pt electrodes because the RuOx electrodes can also be used as electrochemical sensor for pH, O-2, and nitric oxide, providing multisensory functionality with the same electrode. First, the EIS signal was validated in an optically transparent well-plate setup using Pt wire electrodes. This way, visual data could be recorded simultaneously. Frequency analyses of both EIS and the visual data revealed almost identical frequency components. This suggests both the EIS and visual data captured the similar events of the beating of (an area of) hPSC-CMs. Similar EIS measurement was then performed using the RuOx electrode, which yielded comparable signal and periodicity. This mode of operation adds to the versatility of the RuOx electrode's use in in vitro studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据