4.6 Article

A Fully Open-Source Approach to Intelligent Edge Computing: AGILE's Lesson

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21041309

关键词

modular approach; IoT; edge computing; open source; open hardware; knowledge-based configuration; recommender systems

资金

  1. AGILE project within the Horizon 2020 programme of the European Union [688088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The AGILE project has developed a modular hardware and software framework to address the fragmented market of IoT gateways, providing a low-cost solution to support proof-of-concept and rapid prototyping.
In this paper, we describe the main outcomes of AGILE (acronym for Adaptive Gateways for dIverse muLtiple Environments), an EU-funded project that recently delivered a modular hardware and software framework conceived to address the fragmented market of embedded, multi-service, adaptive gateways for the Internet of Things (IoT). Its main goal is to provide a low-cost solution capable of supporting proof-of-concept implementations and rapid prototyping methodologies for both consumer and industrial IoT markets. AGILE allows developers to implement and deliver a complete (software and hardware) IoT solution for managing non-IP IoT devices through a multi-service gateway. Moreover, it simplifies the access of startups to the IoT market, not only providing an efficient and cost-effective solution for industries but also allowing end-users to customize and extend it according to their specific requirements. This flexibility is the result of the joint experience of established organizations in the project consortium already promoting the principles of openness, both at the software and hardware levels. We illustrate how the AGILE framework can provide a cost-effective yet solid and highly customizable, technological foundation supporting the configuration, deployment, and assessment of two distinct showcases, namely a quantified self application for individual consumers, and an air pollution monitoring station for industrial settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据