4.2 Review

COVID-19 and Its Implications for Thrombosis and Anticoagulation

期刊

出版社

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722992

关键词

COVID-19; SARS-CoV2; thrombosis; deep venous thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; anticoagulation; inflammation; hypercoagulability; prothrombotic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coagulopathy in COVID-19 presents with various thrombotic complications, even in patients receiving anticoagulation, raising questions about optimal dosages, monitoring strategies, post-discharge management, and the role of different medications in treating this condition. The significance of isolated ischemic stroke and limb ischemia in relation to other clinical and laboratory features remains to be elucidated.
Venous thromboembolism, occlusion of dialysis catheters, circuit thrombosis in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) devices, acute limb ischemia, and isolated strokes, all in the face of prophylactic and even therapeutic anticoagulation, are features of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) coagulopathy. It seems well established at this time that a COVID-19 patient deemed sick enough to be hospitalized, should receive at least prophylactic dose anticoagulation. However, should some hospitalized patients have dosage escalation to intermediate dose? Should some be considered for full-dose anticoagulation without a measurable thromboembolic event and how should that anticoagulation be monitored? Should patients receive postdischarge anticoagulation and with what medication and for how long? What thrombotic issues are related to the various medications being used to treat this coagulopathy? Is antiphospholipid antibody part of this syndrome? What is the significance of isolated ischemic stroke and limb ischemia in this disorder and how does this interface with the rest of the clinical and laboratory features of this disorder? The aims of this article are to explore these questions and interpret the available data based on the current evidence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据