4.3 Review

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the management of epilepsy: A systematic review

期刊

SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 85-95

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.01.020

关键词

Seizure; Brain stimulation; Brain polarization; Transcranial electric stimulation; Galvanic stimulation

资金

  1. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  2. University of Sao Paulo Medical School
  3. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2019/07256-7, 2019/10760-9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a systematic review on the application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with epilepsy, and the results indicate that cathodal tDCS may be a safe and effective technique for seizure control in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, more and larger sham-controlled randomized trials are needed to further advance this treatment method.
Purpose: Current therapies for the management of epilepsy are still suboptimal for several patients due to inefficacy, major adverse events, and unavailability. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), an emergent non-invasive neuromodulation technique, has been tested in epilepsy samples over the past two decades to reduce either seizure frequency or electroencephalogram (EEG) epileptiform discharges. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO record CRD42020160292). A thorough electronic search was completed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Scopus databases for trials that applied tDCS interventions to children and adults with epilepsy of any cause, from inception to April 30, 2020. Results: Twenty-seven studies fulfilled eligibility criteria, including nine sham-controlled and 18 uncontrolled trials or case reports/series. Samples consisted mainly of drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients that received cathodal tDCS stimulation targeted at the site with maximal EEG abnormalities. At follow-up, 84 % (21/25) of the included studies reported a reduction in seizure frequency and in 43 % (6/14) a decline in EEG epileptiform discharge rate was observed. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Cathodal tDCS is both a safe and probably effective technique for seizure control in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. However, published trials are heterogeneous regarding samples and methodology. More and larger sham-controlled randomized trials are needed, preferably with mechanistic informed stimulation protocols, to further advance tDCS therapy in the management of epilepsy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据