4.7 Article

Improved mechanical properties of silica ceramic cores prepared by 3D printing and sintering processes

期刊

SCRIPTA MATERIALIA
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.113665

关键词

Silica; Ceramic cores; 3D printing; Direction printing; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1106600]
  2. Chinese National Foundation for Natural Sciences [51672217]
  3. Innovation Foundation for Doctor Dissertation of Northwestern Polytechnical University [CX202006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study fabricated silica ceramic cores with improved mechanical properties using stereolithography based-3D printing. By controlling the printing direction and sintering temperature, the flexural strength was optimized, emphasizing the importance of controlling 3D printing parameters and sintering process.
In this study, silica ceramic cores were fabricated by stereolithography based-3D printing with improved mechanical properties. To this end, the green bodies were first 3D-printed in different directions, and then debinded samples were sintered at different temperatures. The flexural strengths of the ceramics reached a maximum value of 12.1 MPa at a sintering temperature of 1300 degrees C due to the enhanced alpha-cristobalite content responsible for the flexural strength at room temperature. Meanwhile, the flexural strengths of ceramics printed by mode 1 (printing performed parallel to the height direction) were much greater than those printed by mode 2 (printing performed perpendicular to the height direction). The anisotropy flexural strength was caused by the weak binding force between layers. Sintered ceramics composed of alpha-cristobalite, beta-cristobalite, and quartz. In sum, the control over the 3D printing parameters and adjustment of the sintering process would result in ceramics with isotropic mechanical properties. (C) 2020 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据