4.7 Article

C clustering and partitioning by static strain aging in cold-rolled 16Cr-5Ni supermartensitic stainless steel

期刊

SCRIPTA MATERIALIA
卷 192, 期 -, 页码 106-110

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.10.016

关键词

-

资金

  1. POSCO Technical Research Laboratories, Republic of Korea
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2020R1A2B5B01001900]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A2B5B01001900] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that after aging at 400 degrees C for 30 minutes, cold-rolled 16Cr-5Ni supermartensitic stainless steel showed a significant increase in yield strength, a decrease in strain hardening rate, delayed martensitic transformation, and redistribution of carbon atoms.
Static strain aging behavior of cold-rolled 16Cr-5Ni supermartensitic stainless steel was investigated after it had been aged for 30 min at 400 degrees C. In uniaxial tensile tests of 20% cold-rolled specimens, increase of yield strength to similar to 300 MPa and decrease of strain hardening rate were observed in the aged specimen, compared to the as-rolled specimen. In interrupted tensile tests, delayed martensitic transformation was observed in the aged specimen. Dilatometry analysis detected volume shrinkage during the 30 min holding period at 400 degrees C indicating partitioning of carbon (C) from alpha' martensite to austenite. The clustering of C in alpha' martensite was confirmed by impulse internal friction technique with observation of Cottrell atmosphere formation. 3D atom probe tomography analysis revealed partitioning of C atoms into austenite and clustering of C atoms in the alpha' martensite. The remarkable increase of yield strength was attributed to redistribution of C atoms during the aging treatment. (C) 2020 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据