4.7 Article

Does public concern over haze pollution matter? Evidence from Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 755, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142397

关键词

Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH); Public concern; Baidu search index; Haze pollution

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0602801]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71573015, 71521002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study quantitatively examines the impact of public concern over haze on haze pollution using an econometric model, finding that public concern can improve air quality in the short term, but this improvement effect varies with different levels of economic development.
Chinese residents are becoming more and more concerned about the living environment especially under the situation of environmental degradation caused by the unbalanced and inadequate economic development. The widespread of internet use provide a new way for public to express the dissatisfaction on environmental pollution. Although the public is the main body of society, the public concern over environmental issues are rarely studied. In this paper, the impact of public concern over haze on haze pollution is quantitatively examined by the utilization of econometric model. Specifically, the Baidu search index (BSI) is utilized as indicators for public concern. Using the panel data consisting of 13 cities in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from the period from January 2014 to December 2019, estimation results showed a significant improvement effect of public concern on haze pollution. In general, the public concern can improve the air quality in a short turn. However, this improvement effect varies with different economic development levels. These findings can help policy makers to better understand the role of public in social governance and improve the air quality in China with the inclusion of public participation. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据