4.6 Article

The coupled non-isothermal, multiphase-multicomponent flow and reactive transport simulator OpenGeoSys-ECLIPSE for porous media gas storage

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
卷 75, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-016-6168-2

关键词

Simulator coupling; OpenGeoSys; ECLIPSE; THMC processes; ANGUS

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through the energy storage funding initiative Energiespeicher'' of the German Federal Government [03EK3022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerical simulations are a viable tool to gain insights into complex coupled THMC processes prevailing in many geoscientific applications. In this work, a coupling approach for OpenGeoSys and ECLIPSE is presented, which combines the multiphase flow simulations of ECLIPSE with heat and reactive geochemical component transport simulations of OpenGeoSys. The coupled simulator is capable of dealing with multiphase-multicomponent systems with no specific limitations regarding the components used. Furthermore, thermal effects like the Joule-Thomson effect and geochemical feedback on fluid flow and mass transport are accounted for by the coupled simulator. The developed coupled code is validated in a series of benchmarks. It is found that the results of the coupled simulator are in very close agreement with those obtained from the reference simulations with the relative errors being smaller than 0.00001, 0.0002 and 0.003 % for phase pressures, saturations and component concentrations, respectively. Validation of the thermal coupling of the simulators shows the same good agreement, if no thermal feedback on fluid flow is considered with a maximum relative error of 0.0015 %. Including thermal feedback on fluid flow shows increased relative differences of up to 0.3 % due to the slightly different equations of states used in the simulators. Given the good accuracy of the validation runs, the coupled code can thus now be applied for reservoir simulations of coupled processes occurring in the subsurface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据