4.7 Article

Study of a stream in Argentina with a high concentration of microplastics: Preliminary analysis of the methodology

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 760, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143390

关键词

Microplastic fibers; Stream pollution; Raman microspectroscopy; Wastewater

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET), Argentina
  2. Comision de Investigaciones Cientificas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (CICPBA), Argentina
  3. SECAT (UNCPBA), Argentina

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study revealed high levels of microplastic pollution in the Langueyu stream, with a majority of fibers and some fragments. The use of oxidative digestion process was effective in analyzing and quantifying the microplastics in the system.
This study presents for the first time results about the microplastic concentration and their origin in a stream of the Pampas region in Argentina, receiving wastewater of an intermediate city. The most appropriate procedure to analyze and quantify the microplastics in the studied system is the use of an oxidative digestion process using a 30% H2O2 solution to eliminate the organic matter in the samples. A high quantity of MPs, on the order of millions of microplastics per m(3) of water, was estimated in the Langueyu stream. 56% of the microplastics correspond to fiberswith diameters between 10 and 15 mu m and lengths less than 500 mu m, while 44% are fragmentswith sizes of tens of micrometers. Raman microspectroscopy was used to identify the type of fibers. The characteristics of the microplastic fibers released in a wash load test are comparable with those observed in the Langueyu stream, in particular, the average sizes and the distribution of the diameters of the MPFs are similar. The processes in the sewage treatment plant, prior to their discharge in the stream, would affect the color of the fibers and their length. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据