4.7 Article

Behavioural responses of breeding arctic sandpipers to ground-surface temperature and primary productivity

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 755, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142485

关键词

Incubation strategy; Incubation recesses; Lag effects; NDVI; Incubation behaviour; Environmental conditions; Shorebird

资金

  1. French Polar Institute [1036]
  2. PRC CNRS Russie (program ECCVAT)
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. Polar Continental Shelf Program
  5. Canada Chair Research Program
  6. Canadian Fund for Innovation
  7. Northern Scientific Training Program
  8. Igloolik Hunters and Trappers Organization
  9. Universite de Moncton
  10. ArcticNet
  11. Polar Knowledge Canada
  12. Churchill Northern Studies Centre
  13. Russian Fund for Basic Research [18-54-15013, 1805-60261]
  14. Yamal-LNG
  15. Gazpromtrans
  16. NGO Russian Center of Development of the Arctic
  17. Netherlands Polar Program of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific research [866.15.207, 886.13.005]
  18. Danish Environmental Protection Agency
  19. Metawad project - Waddenfonds [WF209925]
  20. U.S. Fish andWildlife Service
  21. Arctic Landscape Conservation Cooperative
  22. National Fish andWildlife Foundation
  23. Manomet Inc
  24. Alaska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit
  25. University Centre in Svalbard

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Birds invest time and energy in incubating their eggs, potentially sacrificing other activities. Different incubation strategies in birds lead to different behavioral responses to temperature and primary productivity proxies, with smaller species showing stronger responses to ground-surface temperature. Some uniparental species exhibit a lag effect in nest attentiveness following warm days.
Most birds incubate their eggs, which requires time and energy at the expense of other activities. Birds generally have two incubation strategies: biparental where both mates cooperate in incubating eggs, and uniparental where a single parent incubates. In harsh and unpredictable environments, incubation is challenging due to high energetic demands and variable resource availability. We studied the relationships between the incubation behaviour of sandpipers (genus Calidris) and two environmental variables: temperature and a proxy of primary productivity (i.e. NDVI). We investigated how these relationships vary between incubation strategies and across species among strategies. We also studied how the relationship between current temperature and incubation behaviour varies with previous day's temperature. We monitored the incubation behaviour of nine sandpiper species using thermologgers at 15 arctic sites between 2016 and 2019. We also used thermologgers to record the ground surface temperature at conspecific nest sites and extracted NDVI values from a remote sensing product. We found no relationship between either environmental variables and biparental incubation behaviour. Conversely, as ground-surface temperature increased, uniparental species decreased total duration of recesses (TDR) and mean duration of recesses (MDR), but increased number of recesses (NR). Moreover, small species showed stronger relationships with ground-surface temperature than large species. When all uniparental species were combined, an increase in NDVI was correlated with higher mean duration, total duration and number of recesses, but relationships varied widely across species. Finally, some uniparental species showed a lag effect with a higher nest attentiveness after a warm day while more recesses occurred after a cold day than was predicted based on current temperatures. We demonstrate the complex interplay between shorebird incubation strategies, incubation behaviour, and environmental conditions. Understanding how species respond to changes in their environment during incubation helps predict their future reproductive success. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据