相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Defence against the modern arts: the curse of statistics—Part II: ‘Score-based likelihood ratios’
Cedric Neumann et al.
LAW PROBABILITY & RISK (2020)
Evaluation of Phonexia automatic speaker recognition software under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic voice comparison case (forensic_eval_01)
Michael Jessen et al.
SPEECH COMMUNICATION (2019)
Evaluation of Nuance Forensics 9.2 and 11.1 under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic voice comparison case (forensic_eval_01)
Michael Jessen et al.
SPEECH COMMUNICATION (2019)
A statistical procedure to adjust for time-interval mismatch in forensic voice comparison
Geoffrey Stewart Morrison et al.
SPEECH COMMUNICATION (2019)
Evaluation of VOCALISE under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic voice comparison case (forensic_eval_01)
Finnian Kelly et al.
SPEECH COMMUNICATION (2019)
The impact in forensic voice comparison of lack of calibration and of mismatched conditions between the known-speaker recording and the relevant-population sample recordings
Geoffrey Stewart Morrison
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2018)
Score based procedures for the calculation of forensic likelihood ratios - Scores should take account of both similarity and typicality
Geoffrey Stewart Morrison et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2018)
Evaluation of Batvox 3.1 under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic voice comparison case (forensic_eval_01)
Cuiling Zhang et al.
SPEECH COMMUNICATION (2018)
On the issues of intra-speaker variability and realism in speech, speaker, and language recognition tasks
John H. L. Hansen et al.
SPEECH COMMUNICATION (2018)
Building a unified statistical framework for the forensic identification of source problems
Danica M. Ommen et al.
LAW PROBABILITY & RISK (2018)
Empirical test of the performance of an acoustic-phonetic approach to forensic voice comparison under conditions similar to those of a real case
Ewald Enzinger et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2017)
A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation
Didier Meuwly et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2017)
Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners
Gary Edmond et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2017)
Evaluation of MSR Identity Toolbox under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic case (forensic_eval_01)
Dirceu G. da Silva et al.
SPEECH COMMUNICATION (2017)
A demonstration of the application of the new paradigm for the evaluation of forensic evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison case
Ewald Enzinger et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2016)
Multi-laboratory evaluation of forensic voice comparison systems under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic case (forensic_eval_01) - Introduction
Geoffrey Stewart Morrison et al.
SPEECH COMMUNICATION (2016)
Evaluation of Batvox 4.1 under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic voice comparison case (forensic_eval_01)
David van der Vloed
SPEECH COMMUNICATION (2016)
Speaker Recognition by Machines and Humans
John H. L. Hansen et al.
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE (2015)
Deciphering the human condition: the rise of cognitive forensics
Bryan Found
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2015)
Distinguishing between forensic science and forensic pseudoscience: Testing of validity and reliability, and approaches to forensic voice comparison
Geoffrey Stewart Morrison
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2014)
Tutorial on logistic-regression calibration and fusion:converting a score to a likelihood ratio
Geoffrey Stewart Morrison
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2013)
Information-Theoretical Assessment of the Performance of Likelihood Ratio Computation Methods
Daniel Ramos et al.
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2013)
Effects of telephone transmission on the performance of formant-trajectory-based forensic voice comparison - Female voices
Cuiling Zhang et al.
SPEECH COMMUNICATION (2013)
Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems
Geoffrey Stewart Morrison
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2011)
Emulating DNA: Rigorous quantification of evidential weight in transparent and testable forensic speaker recognition
Joaquin Gonzalez-Rodriguez et al.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING (2007)
Application-independent evaluation of speaker detection
N Brümmer et al.
COMPUTER SPEECH AND LANGUAGE (2006)
分享论文
