4.8 Article

Structure and dynamics of the CGRP receptor in apo and peptide-bound forms

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 372, 期 6538, 页码 147-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abf7258

关键词

-

资金

  1. Monash University Ramaciotti Centre for Cryo-Electron Microscopy
  2. Monash MASSIVE high-performance computing facility
  3. MIPS seed funding
  4. Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre grant [IC200100052]
  5. ARC Discovery Project [DP210101504]
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) [1120919, 1159006]
  7. NHMRC program grant [1150083]
  8. Takeda Science Foundation 2019 Medical Research Grant
  9. Japan Science and Technology Agency PRESTO [18069571]
  10. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT160100075]
  11. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1159006, 1150083, 1120919] Funding Source: NHMRC
  12. Australian Research Council [IC200100052, FT160100075] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides insights into the mechanisms of class B1 GPCR activation by analyzing the structures and protein conformational dynamics of GPCRs.
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key regulators of information transmission between cells and organs. Despite this, we have only a limited understanding of the behavior of GPCRs in the apo state and the conformational changes upon agonist binding that lead to G protein recruitment and activation. We expressed and purified unmodified apo and peptide-bound calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors from insect cells to determine their cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures, and we complemented these with analysis of protein conformational dynamics using hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry and three-dimensional variance analysis of the cryo-EM data. Together with our previously published structure of the active, Gs-bound CGRP receptor complex, our work provides insight into the mechanisms of class B1 GPCR activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据