4.2 Article

Keeping mixtures of Norway spruce and birch in production forests: insights from survey data

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
卷 36, 期 2-3, 页码 155-163

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2021.1883729

关键词

Mixed forest; national forest inventory; Betula; Picea; thinning; stand heterogeneity

类别

资金

  1. Formas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that adding birch to Norway spruce plantations can increase habitat and species diversity, but the proportion of birch decreases with stand age, and birch growth rate is lower than that of Norway spruce. While mixed stands have higher species composition diversity, the stand density is not significantly different from Norway spruce monocultures.
Admixtures of birch in Norway spruce plantations are being promoted as a means to increase habitat and species diversity. The implications of this mixture were analysed with regional survey data from southern Sweden. Permanent sample plots from the Swedish National Forest Inventory (NFI), with Norway spruce and admixture of birch, were used to describe the temporal trends in the admixture, regarding species composition and competitive strength. Observations from thinned plots show a higher harvest removal in birch (35%) than for Norway spruce (19%). Observations without thinnings in the period before measurement showed that individual birch tree growth was lower compared to Norway spruce and it decreased even more with increasing stand age and competition. In addition, a complementary field survey, with multiple distributed sample plots in each stand, was used to detect within-stand variation of species composition and density. Although within-stand heterogeneity was larger in mixed stands in terms of species composition, it was not different from Norway spruce monocultures in terms of stand density. These two surveys show that the admixture of birch, for several reasons, decreases over stand age and although birch increases tree species diversity, it does not necessary imply a change in density.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据