4.7 Article

Wind power assessment in the Caribbean region of Colombia, using ten-minute wind observations and ERA5 data

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 172, 期 -, 页码 158-176

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.033

关键词

Renewable energy; Wind power; ERA5 wind power; Weibull wind distribution; Offshore wind power

资金

  1. program Colombia Cientifica [FP44842-218-2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a unique characterization of wind resources in the Colombian Caribbean region, identifying multiple locations with commercial wind potential and offering reliable information, with impressive annual energy production and capacity factors.
The Caribbean region of Colombia is a strategic source of wind energy for Colombia's economic development. However, current estimates of wind energy potential for this region are based on low-resolution observations from a sparse set of weather stations that falls short of the temporal and spatial scales required by the wind energy sector. We present a novel characterization of the wind resource over the Colombian Caribbean, using 10-min average wind records from 13 meteorological stations and comparing the results with newer ERA5 reanalysis data to generate reliable information for the feasibility and operational stages of wind farms. According to the 10-min observations, average wind speeds in the region are in a 2.2 m s(-1) to 8.3 m s(-1) range. Based on Weibull distributions and hourly Wind Power Density (WPD) calculations, we found several locations that offer commercial wind potential, with many having WPD above 800 W m(-2). Furthermore, our estimates based on ERA5 show a wide offshore region in the Caribbean with a WPD over 800 W m(-2) yearlong. Finally, we calculate the Annual Energy Production (AEP) for the stations with promising potential, obtaining capacity factors around 50%, comparable to those of the most productive wind farms worldwide. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据