4.7 Article

Techno-economic study of photovoltaic systems performance in Shiraz, Iran

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 172, 期 -, 页码 251-262

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.012

关键词

Photovoltaic module; Measurement; Dust effect; Degradation rate; Economic analysis

资金

  1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering at the Shiraz University
  2. Fars province weather station

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A three-year experiment in south-central Iran evaluated the performance of PV systems, showing significant differences in dust effects from year to year. The annual degradation rate of the PV module was lower than expected, and economic analysis demonstrated that investing in the PV industry can be profitable even without government support.
Regarding the global increasing trend of photovoltaic (PV) installations, it is necessary to examine their performance under different climatic conditions. In this study, a three years of experimentation was carried out in order to evaluate soiling loss, yearly degradation and economic viability of PV systems in the south-central Iran. The results showed that dust effect in consecutive years can be significantly different. For instance, soiling loss in summer of 2017 and 2019 was 6.9% and 7.7%, respectively, whereas this value was 26.4% in summer 2018 due to a sand storm. The yearly average degradation of PV module was evaluated 1.17%, which was significantly lower than the degradation rate found by considering only first two years operation of PV module. In the economic analysis part of the research, a typical 1 MW solar plant was modeled in PVsyst software by using the measured data. The economic assessment showed that investment in PV industry without any special government support is economically profitable, as net present value (NPV) and discounted payback time (DPT) were found 1,367,499 US$ and 5.82 years, respectively. Also, levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) was 0.099 US$/kWh, which could be reduced to 0.054 US$/kWh by providing loan for investment costs. ? 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据