4.7 Article

From vague interest to strong intentions to install solar panels on private homes in the North - An analysis of psychological drivers

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 455-463

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.034

关键词

Climate psychology; Solar panels; Nordic; PLS-SEM; Consumer behaviour; Theory of planned behaviour

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solar panels have not been widely adopted in Nordic countries compared to the rest of Europe. The study found that perceived behavioural control has the biggest influence on the intention to become pilot customers among house owners who have shown interest in solar panels. Innovativeness has a positive impact on intention, while skepticism towards innovation has a negative effect.
Solar panels have not seen the same widespread adoption in the Nordic countries as in the rest of Europe. The aim of the paper is to investigate how house owners that have already expressed some interest in solar panels form an intention to become pilot customers in an innovative scheme to install solar panels. The main theoretical perspective for the analysis is the Theory of Planned Behaviour, expanded by descriptive norms and innovativeness as a personality trait. The data was collected using an online survey, and data from 577 participants was analysed. The sample consists of individuals that took an active step towards installing solar panels on their residence by responding to a call from a local energy provider. The results show that perceived behavioural control has the biggest influence on intention. Moreover, being innovative influences intention positively while being sceptical to innovation has a negative effect. Attitudes, however, have only marginally significant impact on intention in this target group. The results from this paper can provide suggestions for shaping pro-solar panel messages toward the target group of people positive to solar panels but not yet decided to install. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据