4.8 Article

Progress towards a circular economy in materials to decarbonize electricity and mobility

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110604

关键词

Circular economy; Extractive industries; Green design; Recycling; Zero waste; Renewable energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The global economy continues to unsustainably use over 90% of natural resources; the linear take-make-toss approach prevails over circular economy practices; impacts from resource extraction in mining and extractives industries can be severe.
Over 90% of the global economy continues to use natural resources unsustainably. The linear take-make-toss approach to materials use still prevails over circular economy and industrial ecology ideas in practice. The shift to renewable energy is one step towards building an economy on more circular material flows. But the materials needed to decarbonize electricity and mobility are supplied by mining and extractives industries, places where impacts from natural resource extraction can be most severe. Manufacturers of wind turbines, photovoltaics, batteries and vehicles-critical technologies to the clean energy transition-still primarily rely on feedstocks and inputs from natural resources as opposed to waste for processing and production. Similarly, robust and complete end-of-life (EoL) management strategies are not well developed for these materials. This review synthesizes progress towards a circular economy-reducing impacts from resource extraction, metallurgy, manufacturing, and waste disposal, and resource recovery-in key materials needed to decarbonize electricity and mobility. Efforts to manufacture by principles of sustainable design to reclaim the recycling value of EoL product waste are complicated by new materials and increasingly complex composites. Dialog and collaboration about trends in materials use and waste flows that span extractive industry scientists and professionals to product designers and recyclers will be critical to spurring the technological and policy innovations needed to encourage more progress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据