4.7 Article

Optimization of cyclic preventive replacement in homogeneous warm-standby system with reusable elements exposed to shocks

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107351

关键词

Mission success probability; Preventive replacement procedure; Warm standby; Shock Process; Reusable Elements

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper discusses homogeneous warm-standby systems operating in a random environment, using preventive replacement and element reuse to improve mission success probability. An algorithm for evaluating mission success probability with this strategy is proposed, along with a solution to the problem of determining the optimal number of shocks triggering element replacement.
The paper considers homogeneous, 1-out-of-n warm-standby systems performing missions of the fixed duration when a failure of an operating element results in a mission failure. A system is operating in a random environment modeled by the Poisson process of shocks. Each shock can result in a failure of an operating element with probability increasing with the number of experienced shocks. Therefore, the preventive replacement is used to reduce the probability of an operation failure. The warm standby elements are also affected by the same shocks, however, being partially shielded, they experience milder adverse impacts. To increase the probability of a mission success, the preventively replaced operable elements can be used later as the warm standby elements. Thus, the performance history of each element can be complex consisting of alternating periods in both modes with different environmental impacts. An algorithm for evaluating the mission success probability for any preventive replacement policy with reusing of elements is suggested. The problem of obtaining the number of shocks triggering replacement of each operating element that maximizes the mission success probability is formulated and solved. A numerical example with detailed analysis is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据