4.6 Article

Quantitative EPR study of poly(vinylidene fluoride) activated by electron beam treatment

期刊

RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109421

关键词

Electron beam modification; Membrane; PVDF; Air atmosphere; EPR analysis

资金

  1. German Science Foundation DFG
  2. vanadium redox flow batteries [411688235]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The EPR spectra of PVDF films trapped various radicals after electron treatment, with CH-based mid-chain radicals being the predominant type. While initially generated radicals tend to convert to peroxy radicals in the presence of oxygen, the CH-based radicals in crystalline domains account for a relatively high proportion.
The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra of poly (vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) films were studied in order to identify type and intensity of trapped radicals after an electron treatment with 150 kGy in air at room temperature. The observed EPR spectra consist of superimposed spectra of eight different radicals. The individual spectra were simulated by first derivatives of normalized Gaussian functions including intensity, linewidth, g value, and hyperfine splitting constants of the unpaired electron with hydrogen or fluorine atoms in alpha or beta positions. In addition, the number of trapped radicals was estimated using a standard sample of known spin concentrations. Although initially generated radicals tend to be converted to peroxy radicals in the presence of oxygen, the predominant radical is the CH-based mid-chain radical (-CF2-C*H-CF2-) with a relative intensity of 62.3%. This is attributed to CH-based radicals in the crystalline domains with low molecular mobility leading to an enhancement in its linewidth (Delta Hpp similar to 3.6 mT). A fraction of 20.7% of all radicals are peroxy radicals with anisotropic g values, g(parallel to) = 2.0210 and g(perpendicular to) = 2.0095. The relative intensity of allyl, dienyl and polyenyl radicals amounts to 4.9%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据