4.6 Article

In-air proton beam irradiation induced radiolysis of methyl orange in aqueous solution

期刊

RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109322

关键词

Proton irradiation; Ion radiolysis; Methyl orange; Azo dyes

资金

  1. Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  2. New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology [UNKP-19-4]
  3. European Regional Development Fund and Hungary [GINOP-2.2.1-15-2016-00012, GINOP-2.3.3-15-201600005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that methyl orange in aqueous solution can be efficiently decolorized in the applied proton energy range, and the efficiency of radiolysis depends on the proton energy. The concentration of radical scavenger also has an impact on the degradation of methyl orange, with higher concentration leading to more efficient degradation.
Proton irradiation induced radiolysis of methyl orange was investigated in aqueous solution with an in-air ion beam setup. 566-3024 keV energy protons were used for the irradiations of 1.6 mM aqueous methyl orange solutions, in the presence and absence of tert-butanol radical scavenger. The decoloration of methyl orange was followed by UV/vis spectrophotometry. It was found that the methyl orange can be efficiently decolorized in the applied energy range, caused by degradation processes. Furthermore, the efficiency of methyl orange radiolysis was found to be dependent on the applied proton energy. The irradiations were also carried out in the presence of 0.16 and 0.73 mol dm(-3) tert-butanol using 3024 keV protons. It was found, that at lower concentration of radical scavenger the degradation was less efficient, while at higher concentration of the radical scavenger, interestingly, the degradation was more efficient when compared to the scavenger-less irradiation experiments. Initial G-values were determined for all ion energies and for different scavenger concentrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据