4.6 Article

Radiation induced graft polymerization of glycidyl methacrylate onto sepiolite

期刊

RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109259

关键词

Sepiolite; Gamma radiation; Glycidyl methacrylate; Grafting; Nanohybrid

资金

  1. Nuclear Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)
  2. Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiation induced graft polymerization was used to develop a nanohybrid polymer with glycidyl methacrylate grafted onto sepiolite. The study found that the absorbed dose and monomer concentration significantly affect the degree of grafting, with a maximum grafting of 665% achieved at optimized conditions. Post-polymerization modification with sodium sulfite increased thermal stability of the nanohybrid, and the sulfonated form showed high adsorption for Cu(II) at pH 4, indicating its potential as a metal ion adsorbent for wastewater treatment.
Radiation induced graft polymerization (RIGP) was used to develop glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) grafted nanohybrid polymer. The absorbed dose and monomer concentration significantly affect the degree of grafting on vinyl modified sepiolite (VMS). Maximum grafting of 665% was achieved at optimized absorbed dose and monomer concentration. Post-polymerization modification of the nanohybrid with maximum grafting was carried out with sodium sulfite. Structural studies by ATR-FTIR and XRD analysis of the synthesized nanohybrids confirmed modification at different stages. The morphological changes studied by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) showed the conversion of sepiolite fiber into globular structure. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) revealed an increase in thermal stability of the GMA grafted nanohybrid with the increase in grafting yield. The sulfonated form of the nanohybrid showed highest adsorption for Cu(II) at 4 pH value which indicates its potential as metal ion adsorbent for the recovery of metals from wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据