4.6 Article

Reversed Cherenkov-transition radiation in a waveguide partly filled with an anisotropic dispersive medium

期刊

RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109254

关键词

Cherenkov radiation; Transition radiation; Cherenkov; Moving bunch

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [18-72-10137]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [18-72-10137] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes the electromagnetic field of a bunch moving uniformly in a circular metal waveguide and crossing a boundary between a vacuum area and an anisotropic dispersive nonmagnetic medium. It is found that Cherenkov radiation in the filled area of the waveguide can have reversed direction in relation to the bunch motion, leading to the generation of intensive reversed Cherenkov-transition radiation (RCTR). The main properties of this radiation are described, highlighting essential differences from RCTR in the case of isotropic left-handed medium.
We analyze the electromagnetic field of a bunch that moves uniformly in a circular metal waveguide and crosses a boundary between a vacuum area and an area filled with an anisotropic dispersive nonmagnetic medium. The medium is characterized by the diagonal dielectric permittivity tensor with components possessing frequency dispersion of plasma types. The investigation of the waveguide mode components is performed with the methods of the complex variable function theory. It is shown that in compliance with the parameters of the medium, Cherenkov radiation (CR) generated in the filled area of the waveguide can have reversed direction in relation to the bunch motion. CR can penetrate into the vacuum area of the waveguide, that is, the intensive reversed Cherenkov-transition radiation (RCTR) can be generated. The main properties of this radiation are described, and essential differences from the RCTR in the case of isotropic left-handed medium are revealed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据