4.7 Article

Nitrogen uptake and metabolism of Populus simonii in response to PEG-induced drought stress

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 78-87

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.11.005

关键词

N uptake; N metabolism; AMTs and NRTs; Populus simonii; drought stress

资金

  1. State Key Basic Research Development Program (973 Program) [2012CB416902]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Northwest AF University [A315021529]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, changes in nitrogen uptake, assimilation and the transcript abundance of associated genes were investigated in Populus simonii seedlings treated with 5% polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced drought stress under hydroponic culture conditions with low and normal nitrogen levels (0.01 mM NH4NO3 and 1 mM NH4NO3, respectively). Drought stress negatively affected plant growth at both low and normal nitrogen levels. NH4+ and NO3- concentrations were significantly decreased in the roots and leaves of PEG-treated P. simonii seedlings; however, the ratio of NH4+ and NO3- was increased in these plants. Drought stress also decreased NR and GOGAT activity in roots and leaves, irrespective of the nitrogen levels. However, the NH4+ concentrations and NR activity in roots and leaves were increased in response to 1 mM NH4NO3 under drought stress. PEG-treated plants also showed better growth at normal nitrogen level (1 mM NH4NO3), with increased biomass, total fine root length and larger root surface area. Most genes related to nitrate uptake, reduction and N metabolism were down-regulated; however, two ammonium transporter genes closely related to NH4+ uptake (AMT1;2 and AMT1;6) were up -regulated in response to drought stress. These results suggested that increased N nutrition may have contributed to drought tolerance in P. simonii by increasing NH4+ uptake and decreasing nitrogen metabolism. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据