4.7 Article

Comparison of different scoring methods based on latent variable models of the PHQ-9: an individual participant data meta-analysis

期刊

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
卷 52, 期 15, 页码 3472-3483

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291721000131

关键词

Confirmatory factor analysis; depression; Latent variable modeling; screening

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [KRS-134297, PCG-155468]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Fi 1999/6-1]
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GY1150]
  4. Fonds de recherche du Quebec -Sante (FRQS) Postdoctoral Training Fellowship
  5. FRQS researcher salary awards
  6. FRQS Postdoctoral Training Fellowship
  7. Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
  8. G.R. Caverhill Fellowship from the Faculty of Medicine, McGill University
  9. Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship
  10. CIHR Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship master's awards
  11. Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
  12. Alberta Health Services through the Calgary Health Trust
  13. Hotchkiss Brain Institute
  14. Senior Health Scholar Award from Alberta Innovates Health Solutions
  15. Canada Research Chair in Neurological Health Services Research
  16. AIHS Population Health Investigator Award
  17. Department of Education [H133B080025]
  18. National Multiple Sclerosis Society [MB 0008]
  19. Lundbeck International [M-288]
  20. Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  21. CIHR
  22. Crohn's and Colitis Canada
  23. Bingham Chair in Gastroenterology
  24. Waugh Family Chair in Multiple Sclerosis
  25. Research Manitoba Chair
  26. PRogramme for Improving Mental health carE (PRIME)
  27. UK Department for International Development [201446]
  28. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems: University of Washington [H133N060033]
  29. Baylor College of Medicine [H133N060003]
  30. University of Michigan [H133N060032]
  31. Grand Challenges Canada [0087-04]
  32. NIMH [R24 MH071604]
  33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [R49 CE002093]
  34. Spanish Ministry of Health's Health Research Fund (Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias) [97/1184]
  35. Duke Global Health Institute [453-0751]
  36. United States Agency for International Development Victims of Torture Fund [AID-DFD A-00-08-00308]
  37. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia/National Council for Science and Technology [CB-2009-133923-H]
  38. Reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade de Sao Paulo [09.1.01689.17.7]
  39. Banco Santander [10.1.01232.17.9, PQ-CNPq-2 -number 301321/2016-7]
  40. Pfizer, Germany
  41. medical faculty of the University of Heidelberg, Germany [121/2000]
  42. Department of Defense [W81XWH-08-2-0100/W81XWH-08-2-0102, W81XWH-12-2-0117/W81XWH-12-2-0121]
  43. Italian Ministry of Health [U10CA21661, U10CA180868, U10CA180822, U10CA37422]
  44. National Cancer Institute
  45. Pennsylvania Department of Health - United Kingdom National Health Service Lothian Neuro-Oncology Endowment Fund [NCI K07 CA 093512]
  46. Lance Armstrong Foundation - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration [R40MC07840]
  47. NIH [T32 GM07356]
  48. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [R36 HS018246]
  49. National Center for Research Resources [TL1 RR024135]
  50. junior research grant from the medical faculty, University of Leipzig - bequest from Jennie Thomas through the Hunter Medical Research Institute
  51. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) Mental Health Program [100.003.005, 100.002.021]
  52. Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a comprehensive dataset of diagnostic studies, scoring using complex latent variable models do not improve screening accuracy of the PHQ-9 meaningfully as compared to the simple sum score approach.
Background Previous research on the depression scale of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) has found that different latent factor models have maximized empirical measures of goodness-of-fit. The clinical relevance of these differences is unclear. We aimed to investigate whether depression screening accuracy may be improved by employing latent factor model-based scoring rather than sum scores. Methods We used an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) database compiled to assess the screening accuracy of the PHQ-9. We included studies that used the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) as a reference standard and split those into calibration and validation datasets. In the calibration dataset, we estimated unidimensional, two-dimensional (separating cognitive/affective and somatic symptoms of depression), and bi-factor models, and the respective cut-offs to maximize combined sensitivity and specificity. In the validation dataset, we assessed the differences in (combined) sensitivity and specificity between the latent variable approaches and the optimal sum score (> 10), using bootstrapping to estimate 95% confidence intervals for the differences. Results The calibration dataset included 24 studies (4378 participants, 652 major depression cases); the validation dataset 17 studies (4252 participants, 568 cases). In the validation dataset, optimal cut-offs of the unidimensional, two-dimensional, and bi-factor models had higher sensitivity (by 0.036, 0.050, 0.049 points, respectively) but lower specificity (0.017, 0.026, 0.019, respectively) compared to the sum score cut-off of > 10. Conclusions In a comprehensive dataset of diagnostic studies, scoring using complex latent variable models do not improve screening accuracy of the PHQ-9 meaningfully as compared to the simple sum score approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据