4.3 Article

Cost of mHealth Versus Clinic-Based Care for Serious Mental Illness: Same Effects, Half the Price Tag

期刊

PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES
卷 72, 期 4, 页码 448-451

出版社

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000349

关键词

-

资金

  1. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [CER-1403-11403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that mobile health intervention (FOCUS) and clinic-based group intervention (WRAP) produced similar clinical outcomes for treating serious mental illness. Labor costs were the largest expenditure for both interventions.
Objective: This study compared the costs of implementing a smartphone-delivered mobile health (mHealth) intervention (called FOCUS) with the costs of implementing a clinic-based group intervention (Wellness Recovery Action Planning [WRAP]) for serious mental illness. Treatments were delivered in parallel in a randomized controlled trial and produced comparable clinical outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cost data were collected by using mixed-methods, top-down expenditure analysis with microcosting procedures. Costs were organized by input categories, including personnel, supplies, equipment, overhead, and indirect costs. All estimates are reported in US$. Results: The average annual cost to providers was $78,212 for WRAP and $40,439 for FOCUS. In both groups, labor accounted for the largest cost, followed by indirect costs and overhead costs. When indirect costs were excluded, WRAP cost $520 per client per month, compared with $256 for FOCUS. Conclusions: mHealth produced the same patient outcomes as clinic-based group treatment at approximately half the cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据