4.7 Article

Room-temperature self-healable and stretchable waterborne polyurethane film fabricated via multiple hydrogen bonds

期刊

PROGRESS IN ORGANIC COATINGS
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.106081

关键词

Self-healing; Mechanically strengthened; Waterborne polyurthane; Tannic acid; Hydrogen bonds

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51773129, 51903167]
  2. Support Plan of Science and Technology Department of Si-chuan Province, China [2019YFG0257, 2020YFG0071]
  3. International Science and Technology Coop-eration Program of Chengdu [2019-GH02-00020-HZ, 2019-GH02-00021-HZ]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple strategy for preparing self-healable cationic waterborne polyurethane was reported, with cross-links formed via hydrogen bonds between tannic acid and the rigid domains of linear WPU. The material showed enhanced mechanical properties and self-healing abilities under moderate conditions.
A simple strategy is reported for preparing self-healable cationic waterborne polyurethane (WPU/TA(x)), in which cross-links are formed via hydrogen bonds between tannic acid (TA) and the rigid domains of linear WPU. The cut could be able to completely heal in air condition at room temperature in one week without any external stimulation. The healing time can be largely reduced to 3 h when the cut sample are treated at 50 degrees C. The rigid domain's containing multiple types of H-bonds classified as ordered H-bonds and disordered bonds is the main reason for the self-healing property, which is supported by Infrared spectrum. These H-bonds are also responsible for greatly improved mechanical properties of WPU. The maximum tensile strength and elastic modulus of WPU/TA5.1 are twice and 2.5 times that of pure WPU respectively, up to 32 MPa and 2.44 MPa. The combination of enhanced mechanical properties and self-healing in moderate conditions is achieved by just simply mixing WPU dispersion and tannic acid aqueous solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据