4.4 Article

Catalytic effect of a novel MgC0.5Co3 compound on the dehydrogenation of MgH2

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2021.01.009

关键词

Hydrogen storage materials; Magnesium hydride; Dehydrogenation performance; MgC0; 5Co3 alloy compound

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [E2018203117, E2019203161, E2019203414, E2020203081]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51771164, 52071281, 51971197]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study improved the dehydrogenation performance of MgH2 by introducing MgC0.5Co3 compound, resulting in the MgH2?MgC0.5Co3 composite releasing more hydrogen at lower temperatures and significantly reducing the hydrogen desorption activation energy; MgC0.5Co3 exhibited catalytic effects on MgH2 and showed good chemical stability after cycling.
The application of magnesium hydride (MgH2) is limited due to the high reaction temperature and slow kinetics during dehydrogenation. In order to ameliorate the dehydrogenation property of MgH2, MgC0.5Co3 compound with induction and catalytic effects was introduced into the Mg/MgH2 system via ball-milling and hydriding combustion methods in present study. Compared to the pure MgH2, the initial hydrogen desorption temperature of MgH2?MgC0.5Co3 composite lowered to 237 ?C, decreasing by 141 ?C. At 325 ?C the MgH2?MgC0.5Co3 composite could release 4.38 wt% H2 within 60 min, which is 4.5 times the capacity of hydrogen released by as milled-MgH2. Besides, the hydrogen desorption activation energy of the MgH2?MgC0.5Co3 composite was dramatically reduced to 126.7 ? 1.4 kJ/mol. It was observed that MgC0.5Co3 was chemically stable and no chemical transformation occurred after cycling, which not only inhibited the nucleation and growth of composite particles, but also had a positive effect on the hydrogen desorption reaction of MgH2 due to its catalytic effect. This study may provide references for designing and synthesizing Mg?C?Co alloy compound for the Mg-based hydrogen storage area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据