4.8 Article

Discharge of swine wastes risks water quality and food safety: Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes, from swine sources to the receiving environments

期刊

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
卷 92-93, 期 -, 页码 210-219

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.023

关键词

Antibiotic resistance genes; Antibiotics; Swine farms; Lagoon; Digester; Vegetables

资金

  1. Ministry of Environmental Protection of China [201309031]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-EW-108, KZZD-EW-09]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC U113305, 41303077]
  4. Guangdong Provincial Government
  5. Guangzhou Municipal Government [20150401007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Swine feedlots are widely considered as a potential hotspot for promoting the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the environment. ARGs could enter the environment via discharge of animal wastes, thus resulting in contamination of soil, water, and food. We investigated the dissemination and diversification of 22 ARGs conferring resistance to sulfonamides, tetracyclines, chloramphenicols, and macrolides as well as the occurrence of 18 corresponding antibiotics from three swine feedlots to the receiving water, soil environments and vegetables. Most ARGs and antibiotics survived the on-farm waste treatment processes in the three swine farms. Elevated diversity of ARGs was observed in the receiving environments including river water and vegetable field soils when compared with respective controls. The variation of ARGs along the vertical soil profiles of vegetable fields indicated enrichment and migration of ARGs. Detection of various ARGs and antibiotic residues in vegetables fertilized by swine wastes could be of great concern to the general public. This research demonstrated the contribution of swine wastes to the occurrence and development of antibiotic resistance determinants in the receiving environments and potential risks to food safety, and human health. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据