4.6 Review

Microalgae with a truncated light-harvesting antenna to maximize photosynthetic efficiency and biomass productivity: Recent advances and current challenges

期刊

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 83-91

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2021.03.006

关键词

Microalgae; Photosynthesis; Antenna molecule; Light-harvesting complex; UV radiations

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST) , Government of India, New Delhi [INT/RUS/RFBR/347]
  2. RUDN University Strategic Academic Leadership Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microalgae and their biomass have been advocated for eco-friendly applications, but commercial cultivation is limited by inefficient photosynthetic efficiency. Strategies such as mutagenesis and genetic engineering have been employed to obtain mutant strains with regulated antenna size for enhanced photosynthetic efficiency and overall biomass productivity, but challenges remain.
Microalgae and the associated biomass have been advocated for various eco-friendly applications. Although, microalgae are a good source of biofuels, metabolites, and value-added products, their commercial cultivation suffers from limited biomass yield due to inefficient photosynthetic efficiency. Minimizing the light-harvesting antenna size of the photosystems has been recognized as an effective mechanism to enhance photosynthetic efficiency and overall biomass productivity in microalgal cultures. Several strategies including mutagenesis, through UV radiations and chemical mutagenesis, genetic engineering, and DNA insertional mutagenesis have been employed to obtain mutant strains possessing a regulated antenna with a regulated limited number of lightharvesting molecules. However, there are still a number of challenges associated with antenna mutants that need to be addressed. This review highlights the recent developments in truncated antenna mutants of microalgae, aiming to increase the photosynthetic efficiency and biomass productivity of the respective cultures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据