4.8 Article

Intracellular pathways for lignin catabolism in white-rot fungi

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2017381118

关键词

Trametes versicolor; Gelatoporia subvermispora; aromatic compounds; carbon cycling; metabolism

资金

  1. US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science
  2. US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  3. Office of Biological and Environmental Research [grid.436923.9]
  4. DOE Office of Science [DE-ACO2-05CH11231]
  5. Laboratory Directed Research and Development project at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
  6. US DOE [DE-AC36-08G 028308]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that two white-rot fungi can utilize lignin as a carbon source and funnel carbon from lignin-derived aromatic compounds into central carbon metabolism via intracellular catabolic pathways. These insights into global carbon cycling and the foundation for a sustainable bioeconomy highlight the importance of simultaneous lignin depolymerization and bioconversion by white-rot fungi.
Lignin is a biopolymer found in plant cell walls that accounts for 30% of the organic carbon in the biosphere. White-rot fungi (WRF) are considered the most efficient organisms at degrading lignin in nature. While lignin depolymerization by WRF has been extensively studied, the possibility that WRF are able to utilize lignin as a carbon source is still a matter of controversy. Here, we employ 13 C-isotope labeling, systems biology approaches, and in vitro enzyme assays to demonstrate that two WRF, Trametes versicolor and Gelatoporia subvermispora, funnel carbon from lignin-derived aromatic compounds into central carbon metabolism via intracellular catabolic pathways. These results provide insights into global carbon cycling in soil ecosystems and furthermore establish a foundation for employing WRF in simultaneous lignin depolymerization and bioconversion to bioproducts-a key step toward enabling a sustainable bioeconomy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据