4.8 Article

Clutch mechanism of chemomechanical coupling in a DNA resecting motor nuclease

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2023955118

关键词

helicase mechanism; DNA repair; Mycobacterium

资金

  1. NIH [R35-GM126945, R01-AI64693, R01-CA236606, R35-GM118026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mycobacterial AdnAB is a pivotal enzyme involved in DNA repair, particularly in the recombination process of double-strand breaks (DSBs). The study highlights the crucial role of AdnB Trp325 as the key active component of the enzyme, showing that its interaction with the DNA tracking strand is essential for ATP hydrolysis and DNA translocation, without which the enzyme's activity during DSB resection is significantly impaired.
Mycobacterial AdnAB is a heterodimeric helicase-nuclease that initiates homologous recombination by resecting DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The N-terminal motor domain of the AdnB subunit hydrolyzes ATP to drive rapid and processive 3' to 5' translocation of AdnAB on the tracking DNA strand. ATP hydrolysis is mechanically productive when oscillating protein domain motions synchronized with the ATPase cycle propel the DNA tracking strand forward by a single-nucleotide step, in what is thought to entail a pawl-and-ratchet-like fashion. By gauging the effects of alanine mutations of the 16 amino acids at the AdnB-DNA interface on DNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis, DNA translocation, and DSB resection in ensemble and single-molecule assays, we gained key insights into which DNA contacts couple ATP hydrolysis to motor activity. The results implicate AdnB Trp325, which intercalates into the tracking strand and stacks on a nucleobase, as the singular essential constituent of the ratchet pawl, without which ATP hydrolysis on ssDNA is mechanically futile. Loss of Thr663 and Thr118 contacts with tracking strand phosphates and of His665 with a nucleobase drastically slows the AdnAB motor during DSB resection. Our findings for AdnAB prompt us to analogize its mechanism to that of an automobile clutch.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据