4.8 Article

Plant virus evolution under strong drought conditions results in a transition from parasitism to mutualism

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2020990118

关键词

virus evolution; mutualism; experimental evolution; gene expression; hormone signaling

资金

  1. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion-Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional [PID2019103998GB-I00, BES-2016-077078]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [GRISOLIAP/2018/005, PROMETEU2019/012, AICO/2019/150]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Environmental conditions, such as drought stress, play a significant role in the evolution of pathogens like plant viruses. Viruses evolved under drought conditions can enhance the drought tolerance of infected plants, with differences in tolerance linked to changes in host gene expression and phytohormone balance. This study demonstrates that viruses can help host survival in abiotic stress situations, and the extent of this benefit is a selectable trait.
Environmental conditions are an important factor driving pathogens' evolution. Here, we explore the effects of drought stress in plant virus evolution. We evolved turnip mosaic potyvirus in well-watered and drought conditions in Arabidopsis thaliana accessions that differ in their response to virus infection. Virus adaptation occurred in all accessions independently of watering status. Drought-evolved viruses conferred a significantly higher drought tolerance to infected plants. By contrast, nonsignificant increases in tolerance were observed in plants infected with viruses evolved under standard watering. The magnitude of this effect was dependent on the plant accessions. Differences in tolerance were correlated to alterations in the expression of host genes, some involved in regulation of the circadian clock, as well as in deep changes in the balance of phytohormones regulating defense and growth signaling pathways. Our results show that viruses can promote host survival in situations of abiotic stress, with the magnitude of such benefit being a selectable trait.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据