4.7 Article

Investigating the skeleton behaviors of open-graded friction course using discrete element method

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 385, 期 -, 页码 528-536

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.03.012

关键词

Skeleton behaviors; OGFC; Penetration strength; Aggregate gradation; Strong? and ?weak? contacts

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52008405, 51778638]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [2020JJ5744]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study quantitatively investigated the effect of gradation on the skeleton behaviors of Open-graded Friction Course (OGFC) using discrete element method (DEM). Results show that gradation significantly affects the penetration strength, with coarser gradation resulting in higher penetration strength. The penetration process can be divided into three stages related to skeleton damage, particles' rearrangement, and densification.
Behaviors of aggregate skeletons are of critical importance on the performance of Open-graded Friction Course (OGFC). This study quantitatively investigated the effect of gradation on the skeleton behaviors using discrete element method (DEM). Four different gradations of OGFCs and one dense-graded aggregate gradation were selected. Two types of tests were carried out, named as the cyclic compressive test and the penetration test. The 'strong' and 'weak' contact networks were generated, and the fabric anisotropy was analyzed. Moreover, parameters including the peak penetration strength and coordination number derived from the penetration tests were employed to evaluate the skeleton performance. Results show that the gradation significantly affects the penetration strength. The coarser the gradation, the larger the penetration strength. Three stages in the penetration process can be divided, which associated with the original skeleton damage, particles' rearrangement and densification. The proportion of strong contact and the penetration strength show a linear correlation. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据