4.7 Article

Entropy generation and exergy efficiency analysis of ethylene glycol-water based nanodiamond + Fe3O4 hybrid nanofluids in a circular tube

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 380, 期 -, 页码 430-442

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.12.006

关键词

Hybrid nanoparticles; Heat transfer; Exergy; Entropy generation; Thermal performance

资金

  1. Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia [TURSP-2020/49]
  2. Taif University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental results show that the addition of nanodiamond+Fe3O4 hybrid nanofluids can significantly increase thermal conductivity and viscosity, thereby improving heat transfer efficiency. Under the conditions of 0.2% particle loading and 60 degrees Celsius, the entropy generation and exergy efficiency of the hybrid nanofluids are significantly increased.
The entropy generation and exergy efficiency of nanodiamond+Fe3O4 hybrid nanofluids in a circular tube are inspected experimentally. The hybrid nanofluids were prepared in a 60% ethylene glycol and 40% water by weight base fluid and their thermophysical properties were evaluated at different particle loadings and temperatures. The pumping power, friction factor, and heat transfer were evaluated at various particle loading (0.05% to 0.2%) and Reynolds number (2000 to 8000) as well. The results indicated that the thermal conductivity and viscosity are augmented by 14.65% and 79%, respectively at 0.2% particle loading and 60 degrees C compared to the base fluid. At a particle loading of 0.2% nanofluid and a Reynolds number of 7218, the following results are obtained compared to the base fluid data: the Nusselt number, frictional entropy generation, exergy efficiency, friction factor, and thermal performance factor are increased by 19.67%, 210.6%, 17.54%, 15.11%, and 14.19%, respectively; while the thermal entropy generation is decreased by 22.93%. New regression equations are modeled to evaluate the Nusselt number, friction factor, and thermophysical properties. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据